Buy on Amazon
€1,216.62
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $5489
Availability
MSRP in USD: $5489
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is 75 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
- Performs up to 4% better in Dirt 5 than Core i5-10400F - 190 vs 183 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 128 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 93% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX - $72.93 vs $1096.05
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX - 65 vs 280 Watts
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
190
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€1216.62
6%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 64-core, 128-thread desktop processor
Buy for €1,216.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77002 minutes ago
Intel Core i5-10400F Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.3 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 65W, Model Number: BX8070110400F
Buy for €80.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77002 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Core i5-10400F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-10400F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1438
89.98748435544431%
Multi-Core
5751
38.78473158888589%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
| Castle Peak | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 6 |
128 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| 280 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.