Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is 2871 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
- Performs up to 41% better in War Thunder than Core i3-3240 - 191 vs 135 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240 - 128 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Up to 97% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX - $29.98 vs $1096.05
- Consumes up to 80% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX - 55 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
191
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€1216.62
2%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,216.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77794 minutes ago
Buy for €33.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77794 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
554
34.668335419274094%
Multi-Core
1137
7.667925546263825%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | vs | Intel Core i3-3240 |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 2 |
128 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
280 W | TDP | 55 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |