Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is 2821 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
- Performs up to 13% better in Saints Row than FX-6300 - 165 vs 146 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 128 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 96% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX - $42.42 vs $1096.05
- Consumes up to 66% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX - 95 vs 280 Watts
Saints Row
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
165
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€1216.62
3%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,216.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77144 minutes ago
Buy for €47.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77143 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | FX |
Castle Peak | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 6 |
128 | Threads | 6 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |