Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4790K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 2266 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4790K.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Performs up to 7% better in Starfield than Core i7-4790K - 62 vs 58 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4790K - 64 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4790K
- Up to 91% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - $103.07 vs $1115.06
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 88 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
62
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€1237.72
9%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,237.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 245 minutes ago
Buy for €114.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 245 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1387
83.80664652567977%
Multi-Core
4394
30.13924137457987%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | vs | Intel Core i7-4790K |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 4 |
64 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 88 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |