Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 245 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 64 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 5% better in Valheim than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 215 vs 205 FPS
- Up to 90% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - $109.68 vs $1115.06
- Up to 91% better value when playing Valheim than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - $0.57 vs $6.04 per FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 125 vs 280 Watts
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
205
95.34883720930233%
Value, €/FPS
€6.04/FPS
9.437086092715232%
Price, €
€1237.72
9%
Buy for €1,237.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1965 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
215
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.57/FPS
100%
Price, €
€121.75
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €121.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1966 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Single-Core
1655
75.36429872495447%
Multi-Core
14579
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 6 |
64 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |