Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 75 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10600K.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10600K - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Up to 89% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - $101.59 vs $950.54
- Up to 89% better value when playing F1 22 than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - $0.4 vs $3.77 per FPS
- Consumes up to 66% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 95 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
280
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.77/FPS
10.610079575596817%
Price, €
€1055.1
10%
Buy for €1,055.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 59207 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
280
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€112.77
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €112.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 59207 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1658
98.92601431980907%
Multi-Core
6838
55.35497450012142%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |