Buy on Amazon
€750.75
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1149
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1149
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms the cheaper FX-9590 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-9590 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 2590 days newer than the cheaper FX-9590.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 8% better in The Last of Us Part I than FX-9590 - 138 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9590 - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Up to 69% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - $210.6 vs $676.35
- Up to 66% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - $1.83 vs $5.44 per FPS
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 220 vs 280 Watts
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
138
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.44/FPS
33.639705882352935%
Price, €
€750.75
31%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-core, 32-thread desktop processor
Buy for €750.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3828 minutes ago
FX-9590
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
128
92.7536231884058%
Value, €/FPS
€1.83/FPS
100%
Price, €
€233.77
100%
Value Winner
AMD FD9590FHHKWOF FX-9590 8-core 4.7 GHz Socket AM3+ 220W Black Edition Desktop Processor
Buy for €233.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3822 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FX-9590
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | FX |
| Castle Peak | Codename | Vishera |
| AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
| 280 W | TDP | 220 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.