Buy on Amazon
€750.75
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1149
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1149
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 2633 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 28% better in Dota 2 than FX-6350 - 215 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 32 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 89% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - $73.11 vs $676.35
- Up to 86% better value when playing Dota 2 than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - $0.48 vs $3.49 per FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 125 vs 280 Watts
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
215
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.49/FPS
13.753581661891115%
Price, €
€750.75
10%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-core, 32-thread desktop processor
Buy for €750.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2181 minutes ago
FX-6350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
168
78.13953488372093%
Value, €/FPS
€0.48/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.15
100%
Value Winner
AMD FD6350FRHKBOX FX-6350 FX-Series 6-Core Black Edition
Buy for €81.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2174 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FX-6350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | FX |
| Castle Peak | Codename | Vishera |
| AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 6 |
| 3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 280 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.