Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX outperforms Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX is 833 days newer than Celeron G4900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
- Performs up to 55% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Celeron G4900 - 399 vs 257 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 24 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX - 54 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
399
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
257
64%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€43.46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €43.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5091 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Jul 14th, 2020
Single-Core
1659
100%
Multi-Core
10709
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Celeron |
Castle Peak | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 2 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
280 W | TDP | 54 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |