Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX is 463 days newer than Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
- Performs up to 5% better in Valheim than Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U - 205 vs 195 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
- Consumes up to 95% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX - 15 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
205
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Jul 14th, 2020
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Jul 14th, 2020
Single-Core
1659
100%
Multi-Core
10709
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 8th, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Picasso |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 15 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | No |