Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX is 237 days newer than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
- Performs up to 9% better in Apex Legends than Athlon 3000G - 292 vs 268 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX - 35 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
292
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
268
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€48.69
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €48.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Jul 14th, 2020
Single-Core
1659
100%
Multi-Core
10709
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Athlon |
Castle Peak | Codename | Picasso |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
280 W | TDP | 35 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |