Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3990X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3990X is 83 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10320.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
- Performs up to 0% better in F1 23 than Core i3-10320 - 231 vs 230 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 128 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Up to 97% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3990X - $87.75 vs $2522.57
- Up to 97% better value when playing F1 23 than Ryzen Threadripper 3990X - $0.42 vs $12.12 per FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X - 65 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Feb 7th, 2020
FPS
231
100%
Value, €/FPS
€12.12/FPS
3%
Price, €
€2800.05
3%
FPS Winner
Buy for €2,800.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 165 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
230
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€97.4
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €97.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 164 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Feb 7th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Feb 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 4 |
128 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |