Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, both CPUs are the same in terms of value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 1253 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Performs up to 5% better in Battlefield IV than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 426 vs 404 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 64 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Up to 5% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - $1041.95 vs $1096.78
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 140 vs 280 Watts
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
426
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.86/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1217.43
95%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,217.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3672 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
404
94.83568075117371%
Value, €/FPS
€2.86/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1156.56
100%
Buy for €1,156.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3669 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1180
72.12713936430319%
Multi-Core
5480
39.120502569960024%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 6 |
64 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 140 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |