Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 3970X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 1144 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 3970X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 64 vs 32 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 17% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 225 vs 192 FPS
- Up to 68% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - $356.82 vs $1107.75
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 150 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
192
85.33333333333334%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€1229.6
32%
Buy for €1,229.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 190 minutes ago
Buy for €396.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 189 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Single-Core
1636
52.689210950080515%
Multi-Core
14008
64.15975816424678%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 24 |
64 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 150 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |