Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-13700F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 3970X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-13700F is 1136 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 3970X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-13700F - 64 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 12% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 215 vs 192 FPS
- Up to 80% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - $213.88 vs $1096.78
- Up to 83% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - $1.1 vs $6.34 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
192
89.30232558139535%
Value, €/FPS
€6.34/FPS
17.350157728706627%
Price, €
€1217.43
19%
Buy for €1,217.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
215
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€237.41
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €237.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Single-Core
1636
61.48064637354378%
Multi-Core
14008
90.52019386106623%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | vs | Intel Core i7-13700F |
---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 16 |
64 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
280 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |