Buy on Amazon
€1,229.6
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1999
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1999
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700KF outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 3970X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-11700KF is 477 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 3970X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-11700KF - 64 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700KF
- Performs up to 3% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 226 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 80% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - $225.71 vs $1107.75
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 125 vs 280 Watts
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
219
96.90265486725663%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€1229.6
20%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 32-Core, 64-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor
Buy for €1,229.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 103 minutes ago
Intel® Core™ i7-11700KF Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 5.0 GHz Unlocked LGA1200 (Intel® 500 Series & Select 400 Series Chipset) 125W
Buy for €250.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 102 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Core i7-11700KF
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Single-Core
1636
72.48560035445281%
Multi-Core
14008
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | vs | Intel Core i7-11700KF |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
| Castle Peak | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 8 |
64 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
| 280 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.