Buy on Amazon
€1,359.47
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1999
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1999
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $52
Availability
MSRP in USD: $52
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 771 days older than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Performs up to 0% better in Battlefield IV than Celeron G6900 - 426 vs 424 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 64 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Up to 98% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - $29.24 vs $1224.75
- Up to 97% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - $0.08 vs $3.19 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
426
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.19/FPS
2%
Price, €
€1359.47
2%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 32-Core, 64-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor
Buy for €1,359.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33 minutes ago
Celeron G6900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
424
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.08/FPS
100%
Price, €
€32.46
100%
Value Winner
CUK Intel Celeron G6900 Alder Lake Two Core Desktop Processor (Up to 3.4GHz) 46W Intel UHD Graphics 710 (OEM Tray Version)
Buy for €32.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Celeron G6900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Celeron |
| Castle Peak | Codename | Alder Lake |
| AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 2 |
64 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 280 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.