Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4690S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4690S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 2034 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4690S.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i5-4690S - 191 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690S - 48 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690S
- Up to 88% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - $102.94 vs $877.43
- Up to 88% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - $0.6 vs $5.1 per FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 65 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
191
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.1/FPS
11%
Price, €
€973.95
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for €973.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 137 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
190
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.6/FPS
100%
Price, €
€114.26
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €114.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 136 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | vs | Intel Core i5-4690S |
---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
48 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |