Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 157 days older than the cheaper Core i5-10400.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 3% better in Ready or Not than Core i5-10400 - 274 vs 267 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400 - 48 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Up to 90% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - $90.66 vs $877.43
- Up to 89% better value when playing Ready or Not than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - $0.38 vs $3.55 per FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 65 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
274
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.55/FPS
10%
Price, €
€973.95
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for €973.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
267
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.38/FPS
100%
Price, €
€100.63
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €100.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
48 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |