Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 2034 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-4150 - 193 vs 180 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 48 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Up to 97% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - $30.07 vs $877.43
- Up to 96% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - $0.19 vs $5.05 per FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 54 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
193
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.05/FPS
3%
Price, €
€973.95
3%
FPS Winner
Buy for €973.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
180
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€33.38
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €33.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 45 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | vs | Intel Core i3-4150 |
---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
48 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
280 W | TDP | 54 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |