Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 477 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 1% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Core i3-10105F - 220 vs 217 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 48 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 92% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - $62.14 vs $782.37
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 65 vs 280 Watts
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €868.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 136 minutes ago
Buy for €68.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 129 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Single-Core
1454
87.22255548890222%
Multi-Core
4472
33.58113689269355%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
48 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |