Buy on Amazon
€859.68
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1799
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1799
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 626 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 64 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX - 191 vs 190 FPS
- Up to 79% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX - $159.4 vs $774.49
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX - 65 vs 250 Watts
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
Desktop • Aug 13th, 2018
FPS
190
99.47643979057592%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€859.68
20%
AMD YD299XAZAFWOF Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX Processor
Buy for €859.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75214 minutes ago
Intel Core i9-10900F Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for €176.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75214 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
Desktop • Aug 13th, 2018
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
Desktop • Aug 13th, 2018
Single-Core
1180
70.40572792362768%
Multi-Core
7221
85.69902682174224%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 13th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
| Colfax | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 10 |
64 | Threads | 20 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 250 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.