Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-9100F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-9100F is 253 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 64 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 3% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX - 106 vs 103 FPS
- Up to 93% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX - $84.08 vs $1243.03
- Up to 93% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX - $0.88 vs $13.4 per FPS
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX - 65 vs 250 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 13th, 2018
FPS
103
97%
Value, €/FPS
€13.4/FPS
6%
Price, €
€1379.76
6%
Buy for €1,379.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 174 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
106
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.88/FPS
100%
Price, €
€93.33
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €93.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 174 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 13th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Aug 13th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
Colfax | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 4 |
64 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
250 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |