Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 1240 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 64 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 15% better in War Thunder than Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX - 192 vs 167 FPS
- Up to 96% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX - $29.24 vs $774.49
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Aug 13th, 2018
FPS
167
86.97916666666666%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€859.68
3%
Buy for €859.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76526 minutes ago
Buy for €32.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76524 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Aug 13th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 13th, 2018
Single-Core
1180
73.61197754210855%
Multi-Core
7221
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Aug 13th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Celeron |
Colfax | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 2 |
64 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
250 W | TDP | Not Available |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |