Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is 834 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 48 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Up to 68% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - $169.73 vs $530.11
- Up to 68% better value when playing Metro Exodus than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - $1.32 vs $4.11 per FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 140 vs 250 Watts
Metro Exodus
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
FPS
143
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.11/FPS
32.11678832116788%
Price, €
€588.42
32%
Buy for €588.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53044 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
143
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€188.4
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €188.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53042 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1088
88.09716599190284%
Multi-Core
3898
52.62589442419333%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Oct 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Colfax | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
48 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
250 W | TDP | 140 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |