Buy on Amazon
€608.72
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1299
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1299
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 576 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900 - 48 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 31% better in Diablo IV than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 221 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 43% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - $314.41 vs $548.4
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 65 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
FPS
169
76.47058823529412%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€608.72
57%
AMD YD297XAZAFWOF Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 24 Core, 48 Thread Processor, Pack of 1
Buy for €608.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 195 minutes ago
Intel Core i9-10900 Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series Chipset) 65W
Buy for €348.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 191 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Core i9-10900
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Single-Core
1235
72.47652582159625%
Multi-Core
7407
87.95867474171713%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
| Colfax | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 10 |
48 | Threads | 20 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 250 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.