Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 576 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700F - 48 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 5% better in Remnant II than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 90 vs 86 FPS
- Up to 72% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - $153.55 vs $548.4
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 65 vs 250 Watts
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
FPS
86
95.55555555555556%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€608.72
27%
Buy for €608.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 242 minutes ago
Buy for €170.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 242 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Single-Core
1235
76.61290322580645%
Multi-Core
7407
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Oct 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Colfax | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
48 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
250 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |