Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms Core i5-3470T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is 2314 days newer than Core i5-3470T.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-3470T - 182 vs 170 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470T - 48 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470T
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 35 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
FPS
182
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€588.42
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €588.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1631 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Single-Core
565
45.74898785425101%
Multi-Core
1135
15.32334278385311%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX | vs | Intel Core i5-3470T |
---|---|---|
Oct 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Colfax | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
48 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
250 W | TDP | 35 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |