Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 1190 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400F - 48 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 14% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 158 vs 138 FPS
- Up to 85% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - $81.41 vs $548.4
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 65 vs 250 Watts
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
FPS
138
87.34177215189874%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€608.72
14%
Buy for €608.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 90 minutes ago
Buy for €90.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Single-Core
1235
56.366955727978095%
Multi-Core
7407
83.13131313131314%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX | vs | Intel Core i5-12400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Colfax | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
48 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
250 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |