Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is 2220 days newer than Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Performs up to 27% better in Starfield than Core i3-3240T - 56 vs 44 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 48 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 35 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €20.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77110 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
447
36.19433198380567%
Multi-Core
971
13.109221007155394%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX | vs | Intel Core i3-3240T |
---|---|---|
Oct 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
Colfax | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
48 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
250 W | TDP | 35 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |