Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is 397 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Performs up to 2% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 537 vs 529 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 48 vs 16 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 85% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - $80.42 vs $540.35
- Up to 85% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - $0.17 vs $1.12 per FPS
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 180 vs 250 Watts
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
FPS
537
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.12/FPS
15%
Price, €
€599.79
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for €599.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 197 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
529
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€89.27
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €89.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 197 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Oct 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Colfax | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
48 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
250 W | TDP | 180 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |