Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-9900K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-9900K is 49 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9900K - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 5% better in No Man's Sky than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 181 vs 172 FPS
- Up to 62% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $296.13 vs $786.04
- Up to 64% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $1.82 vs $5.07 per FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 95 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €872.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5596 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
181
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.82/FPS
100%
Price, €
€328.7
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €328.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5595 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X | vs | Intel Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Colfax | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 95 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |