Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10400 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10400 is 608 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400 - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 4% better in Minecraft than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 709 vs 683 FPS
- Up to 88% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $92.0 vs $786.04
- Up to 89% better value when playing Minecraft than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $0.14 vs $1.28 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €872.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 146 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
709
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€102.12
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €102.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 146 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Colfax | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |