Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2950X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is 1095 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6100.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Performs up to 2% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-6100 - 541 vs 532 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Up to 91% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $73.12 vs $786.04
- Up to 91% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $0.15 vs $1.61 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 51 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
FPS
541
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.61/FPS
9%
Price, €
€872.5
9%
FPS Winner
Buy for €872.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
532
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €81.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
Colfax | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
180 W | TDP | 51 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |