Buy on Amazon
€872.5
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $899
Availability
MSRP in USD: $899
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2950X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is 1095 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Performs up to 17% better in HITMAN 2 than Celeron G3900 - 136 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 32 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 96% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $29.18 vs $786.04
- Up to 96% better value when playing HITMAN 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $0.28 vs $6.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 51 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X doesn't have integrated graphics
HITMAN 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
FPS
136
100%
Value, €/FPS
€6.42/FPS
4%
Price, €
€872.5
3%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X Processor (YD295XA8AFWOF)
Buy for €872.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 255 minutes ago
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
116
85%
Value, €/FPS
€0.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€32.39
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3900 2.8GHz Dual-Core Processor SR2HV LGA 1151 (CM8066201928610)
Buy for €32.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 254 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Celeron |
| Colfax | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 180 W | TDP | 51 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.