Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2950X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is 365 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Performs up to 5% better in The Callisto Protocol than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 109 vs 104 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 90% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $80.42 vs $786.04
- Up to 89% better value when playing The Callisto Protocol than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $0.86 vs $8.0 per FPS
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
FPS
109
100%
Value, €/FPS
€8/FPS
10%
Price, €
€872.5
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for €872.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 80 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
104
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.86/FPS
100%
Price, €
€89.27
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €89.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 80 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Colfax | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 180 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |