Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2950X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 2700X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is 134 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen 7 2700X - 541 vs 538 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Up to 81% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $145.5 vs $786.04
- Up to 81% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $0.3 vs $1.61 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 105 vs 180 Watts
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
FPS
541
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.61/FPS
18%
Price, €
€872.5
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for €872.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
538
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.3/FPS
100%
Price, €
€161.51
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €161.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Colfax | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 105 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |