Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 97 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 11% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 82 vs 74 FPS
- Up to 62% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $206.92 vs $548.4
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
74
90.2439024390244%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€608.72
37%
Buy for €608.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74649 minutes ago
Buy for €229.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74648 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
1274
75.34003548196333%
Multi-Core
7454
92.56177821929715%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Colfax | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 95 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |