Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 388 days older than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i9-7920X - $144.51 vs $407.31
- Up to 63% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i9-7920X - $0.76 vs $2.08 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 3% better in F1 23 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 217 vs 210 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 140 vs 180 Watts
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
210
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.76/FPS
100%
Price, €
€160.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €160.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13069 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
FPS
217
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.08/FPS
36%
Price, €
€452.11
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for €452.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13069 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Colfax | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 12 |
24 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 140 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |