Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 1189 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - $144.51 vs $316.59
- Up to 46% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Core i9-12900F - $1.15 vs $2.12 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 19% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 166 vs 139 FPS
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
139
83%
Value, €/FPS
€1.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€160.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €160.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12587 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
166
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.12/FPS
54%
Price, €
€351.42
45%
FPS Winner
Buy for €351.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12586 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Colfax | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 16 |
24 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
180 W | TDP | Not Available |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |