Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 381 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i9-10900X - $144.51 vs $449.68
- Up to 67% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i9-10900X - $0.55 vs $1.67 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900X - 24 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 2% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 299 vs 293 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 165 vs 180 Watts
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
293
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.55/FPS
100%
Price, €
€160.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €160.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12128 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
299
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.67/FPS
32%
Price, €
€499.14
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for €499.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12128 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i9-10900X |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Colfax | Codename | Cascade Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 165 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |