Buy on Amazon
€608.72
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $649
Availability
MSRP in USD: $649
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 381 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900X - 24 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 6% better in Dota 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 211 vs 199 FPS
- Up to 25% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $413.13 vs $548.4
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 165 vs 180 Watts
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
199
94.3127962085308%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€608.72
75%
AMD YD292XA8AFWOF Ryzen Threadripper 2920X (12-Core/24-Thread) Processor 4.3 GHz Max Boost 38MB Cache
Buy for €608.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74317 minutes ago
Intel Core i9-10900X Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 4.7GHz Unlocked LGA2066 X299 Series 165W (BX8069510900X)
Buy for €458.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74316 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Core i9-10900X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
1274
80.83756345177665%
Multi-Core
7454
79.54327179596628%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i9-10900X |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
| Colfax | Codename | Cascade Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 20 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 165 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.