Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7800X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7800X is 464 days older than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i7-7800X - $144.51 vs $353.05
- Up to 59% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i7-7800X - $0.93 vs $2.25 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7800X - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7800X
- Performs up to 1% better in No Man's Sky than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 174 vs 172 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 140 vs 180 Watts
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
172
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.93/FPS
100%
Price, €
€160.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €160.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13033 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
174
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.25/FPS
41%
Price, €
€391.88
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for €391.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13033 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i7-7800X |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Colfax | Codename | Skylake-E/EP |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 140 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |