Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-7700 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-7700 is 638 days older than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7700 - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700
- Performs up to 2% better in New World than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 114 vs 112 FPS
- Up to 12% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $122.11 vs $138.89
- Up to 14% better value when playing New World than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $1.19 vs $1.38 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €154.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
114
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€135.54
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €135.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i7-7700 |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Colfax | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |