Buy on Amazon
€608.72
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $649
Availability
MSRP in USD: $649
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700KF outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700KF is 575 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700KF - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700KF
- Performs up to 8% better in New World than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 121 vs 112 FPS
- Up to 71% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $157.9 vs $548.4
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 125 vs 180 Watts
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
112
92.56198347107438%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€608.72
28%
AMD YD292XA8AFWOF Ryzen Threadripper 2920X (12-Core/24-Thread) Processor 4.3 GHz Max Boost 38MB Cache
Buy for €608.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74722 minutes ago
Intel Core i7-10700KF Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 5.1 GHz Unlocked Without Processor Graphics LGA1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 125W
Buy for €175.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74721 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Core i7-10700KF
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
1274
74.94117647058823%
Multi-Core
7454
92.21823580353829%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i7-10700KF |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
| Colfax | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.