Buy on Amazon
€154.17
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $649
Availability
MSRP in USD: $649
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-10700F is 575 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 13% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $138.89 vs $160.13
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700F - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 17% better in League of Legends than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 195 vs 166 FPS
- Up to 2% better value when playing League of Legends than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $0.91 vs $0.93 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
166
85%
Value, €/FPS
€0.93/FPS
97%
Price, €
€154.17
100%
AMD YD292XA8AFWOF Ryzen Threadripper 2920X (12-Core/24-Thread) Processor 4.3 GHz Max Boost 38MB Cache
Buy for €154.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 209 minutes ago
Core i7-10700F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
195
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.91/FPS
100%
Price, €
€177.74
86%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel® Core™ i7-10700F Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 4.8 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for €177.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 209 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Core i7-10700F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
| Colfax | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.