Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-14400F is 1923 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 5% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - $138.89 vs $146.23
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-14400F - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 15% better in Sea of Thieves than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 265 vs 231 FPS
- Up to 9% better value when playing Sea of Thieves than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $0.61 vs $0.67 per FPS
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
231
87%
Value, €/FPS
€0.67/FPS
91%
Price, €
€154.17
100%
Buy for €154.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 110 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
265
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.61/FPS
100%
Price, €
€162.31
94%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €162.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 108 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i5-14400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Colfax | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
180 W | TDP | Not Available |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |