Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 1554 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $182.69 vs $730.45
- Up to 73% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-13400F - $1.69 vs $6.19 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 9% better in Elden Ring than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 131 vs 120 FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
120
92%
Value, €/FPS
€1.69/FPS
100%
Price, €
€202.79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €202.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 42 minutes ago
Buy for €810.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
Trending Games
Using the selected game parameters
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Colfax | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
180 W | TDP | Not Available |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |