Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10600K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10600K is 575 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10600K - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 11% better in Starfield than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 62 vs 56 FPS
- Up to 27% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $105.07 vs $144.51
- Up to 34% better value when playing Starfield than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $1.88 vs $2.86 per FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 95 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €160.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 111 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
62
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.88/FPS
100%
Price, €
€116.63
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €116.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 110 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Colfax | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 95 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |