Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-8100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-8100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 184 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-8100T.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 2% better in Horizon Zero Dawn than Core i3-8100T - 171 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100T - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100T
- Up to 71% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $149.16 vs $506.05
- Up to 70% better value when playing Horizon Zero Dawn than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $0.99 vs $3.28 per FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Horizon Zero Dawn
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
171
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.28/FPS
30%
Price, €
€561.72
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for €561.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 0 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
167
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.99/FPS
100%
Price, €
€165.57
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €165.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 0 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i3-8100T |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
Colfax | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
180 W | TDP | 35 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |