Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 398 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 0% better in Battlefield 1 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 240 vs 239 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 78% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $108.95 vs $498.74
- Up to 78% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $0.51 vs $2.31 per FPS
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
240
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.31/FPS
22%
Price, €
€553.6
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for €553.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 178 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
239
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.51/FPS
100%
Price, €
€120.93
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €120.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 178 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Colfax | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 180 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |